MediaTek may not have been as popular Qualcomm. But this did not stop the Chinese company to bring more advanced technology. Based on the release of the roadmap, MediaTek mobile processor variant is preparing better than quad core.
Carrying the type MT6592, MediaTek's latest processor could be called octa-core mobile processor technology first in the world.
Unlike
octa-core technology is adopted by the ARM architecture Big.LITLE
Samsung, MediaTek MT6592 solemnly presented 8 processor cores in this
garapannya.
From the leaked roadmap revealed MediaTek, the MT6592 reported to be relying on arable TSMC 28 nm manufacturing. While
its clock speed in the range of 1.7 GHz to 2 GHz and has a video
decoding capability of 1080 pixels at 30 fps (frames per second).
Not
only that, as quoted from Phone Arena, Thursday (04/07/2013), MediaTek
MT6592 supposedly will also equip with support for 4G LTE technology in
it.
Unfortunately,
in a test conducted using AnTuTu, MT6592 only able to carve a yield of
30 thousand points, still well below the 800 who could carve Snapdragon
result in the range of 35 thousand points despite only rely on quad-core
technology.
Certainly interesting how MediaTek processor mix 8 'brain' is. While Samsung, through S4 Galaxy series has brought the octa-core Exynos processor. Actually it is not pure octa-core, but in the form of two quad-core processors are used as one.
1.2 Ghz processor is intended to perform a lightweight mobile operations. While the 1.6 Ghz processor to handle heavy duty like playing games.
"Because
the processor can be split into two to make the battery last longer.
Because one only used for light duty, such as playing games new if used,
only one processor is used," claims Febri Rusli, Product Marketing
Manager Nokia Indonesia, one time.
The system is claimed to make more efficient use of the battery. Well, how MediaTek, dare to offer the technology more beautiful?
gan try to check this article on MediaTek estate octa-core : http://himax-indonesia.com/index.php?ac=article&at=read&did=202
ReplyDelete